Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric J Lyman's avatar

Ciao Mythili. This was an interesting read.

I agree with you ... up to a point. Like you, I appreciated that Coates is very deliberate about naming his perspective, and I’ve been bothered in the past by the fact that Klein rarely does (even when he uses “us” and “we” to refer to the left). That can make it sound like he’s neutral when he’s not. I don't think he's trying to fool anyone, but that still rubs the wrong way sometimes.

I had a different impression of the episode. To me, Klein was more ideological -- not in the sense of being rigid and ignoring other viewpoints, but in sticking to this important idea of engagement, even regarding someone like Kirk, whose rhetoric was ugly and damaging. I think Klein’s openness to talk about mourning across divides constructive, even if it’s hard to do (and very unlikely to be reciprocated if something terrible were to happen to Klein or Coates).

I’m no fan of Kirk’s views, obviously, but I think it’s essential to engage with “the other side.” Coates seemed quicker to reject that bridge-building. In contrast to you, I know Klein’s work better than I do Coates’, so I hope that isn't unfair.

Expand full comment
Mythili Sampathkumar's avatar

I will always admire that kind of georgraphic grudge-holding haha. And to your point, it's true there are still people who are angry at The Clintons for that and other things (some of it justified IMHO, some of it tiresome)

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts